How and where to place consecutive intercalary days in a lunisolar calendar with strictly lunar months, but an Earthlike solar year?
I'm used to saying "I am in India.". But somewhere I noticed it mentioned "I'm at Puri (Oriisa)". I wish to know the distinctions in between "in" and "at" inside the above two sentences.
It is a pity that Google search does not direct me to any handy page about "that which". Can an individual explicate its grammar for me?
the combination which could be the murder of Agamemnon is probably as complicated as that which would be the voyage of Ulysses.
Using the example sentences supplied in Hellion's reply, I do think I can arrive up with an explanation rather then just a tautology! (I was used to accomplishing some thing. = I used to be accustomed to carrying out a little something.)
RobustoRobusto 153k4141 gold badges370370 silver badges616616 bronze badges Include a remark
, both of those of which are pronounced with an /s/, hardly ever a /z/: /'yustə/. This pronunciation is part of The 2 idioms, and distinguishes the idioms from The easy sequence of text:
user144557user144557 111 gold badge11 silver badge11 bronze badge one Officially It is really "used to be" (and that must be used in prepared text), but even native English speakers are not able to detect the get more info distinction between "used for being" and "use being", when spoken.
if I'd been at other locations that day and expected only for being there for some time (especially if another human being understood this). Similarly, I'd say
is appropriate where There is certainly an expectation of or probable for travel away from the location, or where It really is important to differentiate it from other probable locations. Therefore if anyone questioned where I had been, I might say
Why does the definition of newif utilize a edef with noexpand as an alternative to a def in plain TeX? more scorching questions
The discussion During this item, As well as in all the opposite questions This is often discussed in -- many times -- receives confused for the reason that persons are thinking of idioms as being sequences of terms, and they are not distinguishing sequences of terms with two different idioms with completely different meanings and completely different grammars. These are, in effect, completely different words and phrases.
Stack Exchange network contains 183 Q&A communities like Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to understand, share their knowledge, and Establish their careers. Pay a visit to Stack Exchange
Now we test our nifty trick of dropping on the list of "that"s — "I do not think that problem is really serious" —, and we right away get a particular amount of people who parse the sentence as "[I do not Believe that] [problem is serious]" on their own first test, and get terribly confused, and have to return and check out a different parsing. (Is that a back garden-route sentence yet?)